Humanoid Robots
Scientific Literature
“More social interactions and better verbal communication (30% increase) have been observed when a robot was present in the same room. The improvement was not only noticeable in interactions with the robot, but in subsequent interactions with their parents and therapists”
(M.Stanton, National Autistic society, 2008).
- The humanoid robot adapts to the design needs for autism therapy that requires robot dimensions equal to or smaller than that of a human child (Giullian, Ricks, Atherton, Colton, Goodrich and Brinton, 2010).
- For the development of social skills (Michaud and Théberge-Turmel, 2002; Adams and Robinson, 2011),
- For the development of communication skills (Boccanfuso and O’Kane, 2011; Kozima, Nakagawa and Yasuda 2005),
- For the development of exploratory behaviors (Costa, Santos, Soares, Ferreira and Moreira, 2010)
- For early diagnosis (Bekele, Lahiri, Davidson, Warren and Sarkar, 2011; Dickstein-Fischer, Alexander, Yan, Su, Harrington, and Fischer 2011) in children with autism.
Several research paths have been undertaken to evaluate social robots, in particular:
- For the development of social skills (Gillesen, Boere and Barakova, 2010)
- For the development of postural expressions (Erden and Tapus, 2010)
- To increase sociability (Carey and Markoff, 2010)
- For understanding gestures and facial expressions
- For the diagnosis of ASD (Bekele, Lahiri, Davidson, Warren and Sarkar, 2011)
Manage the innovation
Digital therapy via a human-machine interface that simplifies the use of even more robots and which allows:
- Robot Assisted Therapy and activity planning
- Robot management and teleoperation
- Data acquisition
- Data processing
- Data representation
Evaluation of the therapeutic-didactic plan